Compliance

Compliance

Compliance

Cybersecurity Requirements for Defense Contractors

08/2025

5  

min read

General Overview:

When it comes to defense cybersecurity, many companies mistakenly treat all cybersecurity requirements as one unified category. In reality, there are two distinct buckets—IT security and application/product security—each with its own compliance frameworks and scope. This distinction is critical because conflating the two leads to audit failures, unnecessary costs, and/or certification delays.

IT security refers to common cybersecurity requirements that apply across nearly every business, regardless of industry. Examples of components that fall under this category include email servers, computers, wifi networks, accounting software, etc. These are general systems that are common when you think of a standard business.

Application or product security requirements are specific to what your business builds or delivers, rather than internal systems. For example, if you’re a software company building AI tools for the military, your day-to-day IT systems would fall under one set of requirements. But the AI software itself—along with the servers, databases, and environments that support it—would be governed by a separate set of cybersecurity controls. Similarly, if you’re building an aircraft for the military, your corporate IT systems are distinct from the cybersecurity protections needed on the aircraft itself. The embedded firmware, onboard networks, and communication systems (such as radios and networks) must meet specialized security standards aligned with different frameworks.

Scoping:

A clear boundary must be established between IT security and application/product security environments. This boundary defines where IT security responsibilities end and application/product security responsibilities begin. Boundaries are crucial for audits (CMMC, NIST 800-171) as auditors require a defined scope.

Auditors look for physical or logical separation to define system boundaries. In IT systems, this separation is typically achieved through a firewall (cloud-based or local). Specialized systems that are not considered standard IT have a different set of requirements which NIST 800-171 is not intended to handle. Additionally, incorrect scoping can have serious consequences. Over-scoping leads to overly complicated and expensive audits, increasing the risk of failure, while under-scoping results in an insufficient audit that does not meet compliance requirements.

If you are unsure about how IT and Product Controls affect your business, contact Atomus for a free introductory call today.

Logo image

Become Compliant with NIST 800-171, DFARS 7012, and CMMC Requirements

Talk to an Expert